A Message from the SRCD Task Force on Publications and Ethical Behavior to the SRCD Membership

Components

Text

A Message from the SRCD Task Force on Publications and Ethical Behavior to the SRCD Membership

1. The Task Force held its first meeting on October 31, 2022.
This is an update on the work of the Task Force.

2. The membership of the Task Force:

Sandra Graham, UCLA, Co-chair
Daniel Keating, University of Michigan, Co-chair
Lorah Dorn, Pennsylvania State University, Governing Council member
Shawn Jones, Virginia Commonwealth University, Early Career member
Linda Juang, University of Potsdam, Member-at-large
Natalia Palacios, University of Virginia, Member-at-large
Stephen Russell, UT Austin, Governing Council member
Dalal Safa, UNC Chapel Hill, Early Career member
Emilie Smith, Michigan State University, Governing Council member

3. The Task Force has provisionally identified the Scope of Work.
An open period for comments on Scope from the full membership will close on November 9, 2022. Any changes to the Scope of Work that result from that input will be circulated to the full membership of SRCD. Comments should be emailed to Shire Stein (sstein@srcd.org), who will serve as the Executive Assistant to the Task Force, and all Task Force members will review any comments received. The Scope:

SRCD Task Force on Publications and Ethical Behavior:
Scope of Work

Charge of the Task Force from SRCD:
To review and make recommendations related to SRCD’s publication processes and its Code of Ethics

The Task Force has developed the following Scope of Work:

I. Challenges and controversies involving SRCD publications

What led up to the resignations of the editors-in-chief of 3 flagship SRCD journals: Child Development (Glenn Roisman), Child Development Perspectives (Judith Smetana), and Monographs (Lynn Liben)?
What are the expectations about and possible constraints on editorial autonomy articulated in SRCD by-laws?
Are these expectations and constraints clearly communicated to journal editors, SRCD governance, and SRCD administration? How do they get enacted in practice?

II. Challenges and controversies associated with ethical behavior of SRCD members and staff

How did the SRCD Code of Ethical Conduct come into existence in November 2021? What issues was it trying to address?
What concerns have been raised by asking members and staff to sign the Code, and have those concerns been adequately addressed?
Independent of the Code, are there issues about ethical behavior of SRCD members and staff that still need to be addressed?

III. The role of SRCD governance and management

To what extent has SRCD governance and management played a role in the challenges regarding publications and ethical behavior?
In addition to journal editors, there have been a number of recent resignations of both SRCD governance members and administrative staff. Are these resignations related to the challenges associated with publications and/or ethical behavior?
Does the organizational structure of SRCD provide clear guidance about the domains of authority allocated to governance and administration?

IV. Recommendations going forward

What changes to SRCD are needed to address challenges and controversies associated with publications and ethical behavior?
Are there best practices to be learned from other academic societies of similar size and disciplinary breath and scope?
What should be the process and timeline for implementing Task Force recommendations?

4. The process by which the Task Force will operate.

The Task Force is committed to a full investigation of the issues identified in the Scope, while maintaining a balance of independence, transparency, and confidentiality. Specifically:

Individuals who have signed the Code of Conduct that restricts external communication about SRCD matters (Governing Council, Editors, Staff) are released from those restrictions when communicating with the Task Force. A signed assurance of this release will confirm those arrangements for individuals who are providing information to the Task Force.

In lieu of a binding non-disclosure agreement, Task Force members (including Shire Stein in her role as Executive Assistant) have signed a Confidentiality Agreement not to disclose information gathered during its operation. All communications will come from the Task Force as a whole. All records gathered by the Task Force will be available only to the Task Force in a secure site (not including records that are already public, such as the Code of Conduct).

An interim report will be circulated to the full membership a couple of weeks prior to the SRCD Meeting in March, after which a period for comments from SRCD members will be available both prior to the meeting and for one week following the meeting and will be reviewed before the final report is completed. The final report will go first to the SRCD Governing Council, and then to the full membership.

The Task Force will be identifying individuals to interview who may have relevant information for its investigation. Members who have information that they believe to be relevant may contact the Task Force through Shire Stein (sstein@srcd.org), for review by the Task Force, potentially leading to an interview.

Sincerely,
The members of the Task Force on Publications and Ethical Behavior